This version is best for resin printers.

This version is best for traditional FDM printers. See this post for details.

Excellente!Tom wrote: Tue Jul 18, 2023 10:31 am Still doing some testing, but will be posting the .stl for this tool soon.![]()
9262 1 OPRV PIC.jpg
You are amazing!
Well thank you.
Chilton's. Had a few and I remember them well.Tom wrote: Tue Jul 18, 2023 6:17 pmWell thank you.Technology has trickled down to the point where you can buy and use machines (3D printers, CNC, etc.) and make things at home that would have been impossible outside an industrial factory just 10-20 years ago. And, of course, the Internet gives us all access to endless info, nearly instantly. It's a much different world than when I was in high school trying to get my Firebird to run at midnight using nothing but this book:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/175773454986?c ... LAEALw_wcB
Thanks again!Tom wrote: Tue Jul 18, 2023 10:31 am Here is a .stl file for the later style 944 OPRV alignment tool (Tool 9262/1). For calibration purposes, the longest smooth portion of the tool should be 17.51mm in diameter, and the smaller diameter on the very top should be 16.05mm. This one was printed in ABS with .16mm layers, no support, brim, and randomized z-seam. Just tested it on an '89 block and it screwed in and fit like a glove.
944 OPRV Alignement Tool (87+).stl
![]()
1. I did not -- maybe 25% -- shouldn't see any real stress.SE_944ER wrote: Sat Jul 22, 2023 10:31 amThanks again!Tom wrote: Tue Jul 18, 2023 10:31 am Here is a .stl file for the later style 944 OPRV alignment tool (Tool 9262/1). For calibration purposes, the longest smooth portion of the tool should be 17.51mm in diameter, and the smaller diameter on the very top should be 16.05mm. This one was printed in ABS with .16mm layers, no support, brim, and randomized z-seam. Just tested it on an '89 block and it screwed in and fit like a glove.
944 OPRV Alignement Tool (87+).stl
![]()
A few questions:
1. Did you use 100% fill?
2. Does the final product after print needs to be sanded down or can it be used just as it is?
3. Should the layer thickness be 0.16mm or can it change?