Page 4 of 5

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 2:57 pm
by gruhsy
Use a hockey puck under any of the lifting points.
Hockey pucks are stupid cheap.

They also do not slip

You would have to ram into with a truck to knock it off

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 6:01 pm
by danmartinic
"The lift points are mentioned in the owner's manual : "diamonds" on the square frame rails."

Really? I have to look...

Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at 8.58.49 PM.png
Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at 8.58.49 PM.png (83.27 KiB) Viewed 1748 times
Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at 8.59.05 PM.png
Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at 8.59.05 PM.png (243.6 KiB) Viewed 1748 times

I didn't find reference to any diamonds, but yep, it's pretty clear to only raise in front on the inner rails... ...and never on the transmission in the back! That transmission lift is a suggestion at one of the popular tutorials for lifting found online!

Thank you.. glad I found this

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 6:04 pm
by danmartinic
gruhsy wrote: Thu Jan 13, 2022 2:57 pm Use a hockey puck under any of the lifting points.
Up here in Canada, we use hockey pucks for that and for just about anything else lol

How did you jack that thing up so high to get the wooden structures under??

PS: your front "rest point" appears not to be the inner rail... seems too close to the outer side?

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 6:28 pm
by gruhsy
The pucks are hidden in the photo and stacked with 2 or 3 high.
It’s an old photo from 2010

I’m in Calgary hence the pucks :)
danmartinic wrote: Thu Jan 13, 2022 6:04 pm
gruhsy wrote: Thu Jan 13, 2022 2:57 pm Use a hockey puck under any of the lifting points.
Up here in Canada, we use hockey pucks for that and for just about anything else lol

How did you jack that thing up so high to get the wooden structures under??

PS: your front "rest point" appears not to be the inner rail... seems too close to the outer side?

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2022 4:46 am
by Thom
I used the term diamond as this is the shape of the "things" in the square frame rails that show the center of the lift points for the front.

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 5:00 pm
by dr bob
I liked an analogy that went something similar to "...like saving your girlfriend for her next boyfriend."

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 6:36 pm
by Tom
dr bob wrote: Sun Jan 16, 2022 5:00 pm I liked an analogy that went something similar to "...like saving your girlfriend for her next boyfriend."
I may be repeating myself, but when I got my 991.2 Turbo S, it was my ultimate dream car, so I just babied and pampered it the whole time I owned it. Had about 6k miles after nearly 4 years. When I sold it, a guy flew in from out of state to buy it and drive it home. He handed me a check, tossed his luggage in the back seat, taped(!) a radar detector to the dash, then blasted out of the parking lot with the windows down, one hand waiving goodbye out the window, while the other hand did double duty steering and holding his Big Gulp. He scraped the front lip hard on the way out. It was that exact moment when I started questioning why I didn't enjoy it more myself. Lesson learned. The 992 Turbo S is 9 months old and has over 4k miles. :mrgreen:

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:12 pm
by Tom
And now this.... 10k mile '86 951at $40,944 with 2 days to go...

https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1986- ... turbo-200/

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:24 am
by Tom
We're definitely not in Kansas anymore. I paid $12k for my '86 when it had 32k miles, and I'm pretty sure I overpaid at the time....


86 4 83.jpg
86 4 83.jpg (95.16 KiB) Viewed 1621 times

Re: 3100 mile '89 on BAT

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:32 am
by danmartinic
I like this one better than the last.. negligible mileage difference. It's a steal! Ha ha ha!