Tial 38mm Wastegate Plumbing

Talk and Tech about turbocharged 924/944/968 cars
User avatar
NCGermerican
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2022 8:49 am
Location: Raleigh, NC
Has thanked: 141 times
Been thanked: 92 times
Hi Folks. 87 Turbo. I currently have a Tial 38mm dual port wastegate installed along with an LR manual boost controller (mounted in engine bay). I'm not a fan of the manual controller and would honestly rather have my foot determine my boost PSI. This is not a race or drag car - my goal is to have around 300 reliable HP to keep up with modern cars on the street.

After speaking with Charlie at Evergreen (I have a Raptor X), his was very insistent on just using WG spring(s) to determine max boost pressure. His recommendation is to use 1.1 bar spring(s) to get to about 16 consistent pounds of boost at max throttle.

Because there are no 1.1 bar springs available, I will use a large yellow (0.7 bar) and a small red (0.4 bar) to get to 1.1 bar.

My question is about the vacuum line plumbing. Charlie said that I would run the boost source line from the factory location (banjo bolt on pipe before the IC) to the LOWER port on the Tial. He said I should leave the Upper port open (vent to atmosphere).

Can I get some thoughts and/or confirmations on this?

Thanks!
1987 951 - Nautic Blue over Linen
2015 Audi RS5 Sepang Blue (Daily)
2023 Durango R/T AWD - Destroyer Grey (Wife's Daily)
2013 Audi A5 Quattro - Brilliant Black (Son's daily)
1987 944 S - Nautic Blue over Linen - sold August 2024

#1

944m3
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2023 9:33 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 100 times
This video really helped me understand how a dual port wastegate works.

#2

User avatar
whalenlg
Posts: 405
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2021 8:58 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 111 times
For what it's worth...
My 86 turbo came with a Huntley Stage 1 Cheater turbo and a LR Dual Port Wastegate + LR Manual Boost controller.
Stock cycling valve had been removed.
I could never get it to predictably control the boost. Tried replacing the MBC when I figured out its seals were blown. No difference. Boost would spike to 20+ PSI, so my foot ended up as the boost controller like you mentioned.

After I failed CA smog for mods, I installed a used cycling valve and put all the vacuum lines back to stock. That meant leaving the secondary port on the LR Wastegate open and the primary connected to the intercooler banjo fitting.
Everything just worked. I happily max out at 16 PSI now no matter how much throttle I give it.
1986 951 - Silicon Valley

#3

User avatar
NCGermerican
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2022 8:49 am
Location: Raleigh, NC
Has thanked: 141 times
Been thanked: 92 times
whalenlg wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:33 pm For what it's worth...
My 86 turbo came with a Huntley Stage 1 Cheater turbo and a LR Dual Port Wastegate + LR Manual Boost controller.
Stock cycling valve had been removed.
I could never get it to predictably control the boost. Tried replacing the MBC when I figured out its seals were blown. No difference. Boost would spike to 20+ PSI, so my foot ended up as the boost controller like you mentioned.

After I failed CA smog for mods, I installed a used cycling valve and put all the vacuum lines back to stock. That meant leaving the secondary port on the LR Wastegate open and the primary connected to the intercooler banjo fitting.
Everything just worked. I happily max out at 16 PSI now no matter how much throttle I give it.
I think the vacuum lines may actually be reversed on a LR vs. a Tial. The LR pushes outward while the Tial moves inward. I believe that swaps the line routing, but that's what I wanted to confirm.
1987 951 - Nautic Blue over Linen
2015 Audi RS5 Sepang Blue (Daily)
2023 Durango R/T AWD - Destroyer Grey (Wife's Daily)
2013 Audi A5 Quattro - Brilliant Black (Son's daily)
1987 944 S - Nautic Blue over Linen - sold August 2024

#4

User avatar
four0four
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2022 10:09 pm
Location: Western WA
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 32 times
NCGermerican wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:42 am

My question is about the vacuum line plumbing. Charlie said that I would run the boost source line from the factory location (banjo bolt on pipe before the IC) to the LOWER port on the Tial. He said I should leave the Upper port open (vent to atmosphere).

Can I get some thoughts and/or confirmations on this?

Thanks!
Yes, this is correct. The factory wastegate valve moves outward (into the crossover) and the Tial inward (pulls into the wg body).

You can justify this for yourself with a vacuum pump on the top port of the Tial (pulling a vacuum here means the bottom power is under pressure relative to the top chamber)...Or very careful application of low pressure air to the bottom port.

#5

User avatar
NCGermerican
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2022 8:49 am
Location: Raleigh, NC
Has thanked: 141 times
Been thanked: 92 times
four0four wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 1:15 pm
NCGermerican wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:42 am

My question is about the vacuum line plumbing. Charlie said that I would run the boost source line from the factory location (banjo bolt on pipe before the IC) to the LOWER port on the Tial. He said I should leave the Upper port open (vent to atmosphere).

Can I get some thoughts and/or confirmations on this?

Thanks!
Yes, this is correct. The factory wastegate valve moves outward (into the crossover) and the Tial inward (pulls into the wg body).

You can justify this for yourself with a vacuum pump on the top port of the Tial (pulling a vacuum here means the bottom power is under pressure relative to the top chamber)...Or very careful application of low pressure air to the bottom port.
So if I understand this correctly, if I put vacuum to the top port of the tial, it should remain closed until 1.1 bar (16 pounds) of vacuum pressure is achieved and at that point, the valve should open?
1987 951 - Nautic Blue over Linen
2015 Audi RS5 Sepang Blue (Daily)
2023 Durango R/T AWD - Destroyer Grey (Wife's Daily)
2013 Audi A5 Quattro - Brilliant Black (Son's daily)
1987 944 S - Nautic Blue over Linen - sold August 2024

#6

User avatar
four0four
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2022 10:09 pm
Location: Western WA
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Perfect vacuum in the top chamber would only result in 14.7 psi against the spring - so no, but if you installed a weaker spring for arguments' sake, then yes. You miiiight see it begin to move. Sorry, I hope that's not confusing!

#7

944m3
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2023 9:33 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 100 times
This might be semantics or I’m missing your point. But I would not think of it as vacuum.

This is how i understand it, please someone correct me if I’m wrong 🙂

If you put the pressure from the intake via the banjo bolt to the top of the Tial wg, you are adding pressure which helps to keep the wastage closed. Notice I say help. If your spring is 1 bar, and you produce 1 bar boost, the heat or gas pressure in the crossover pipe will need to be 2 bar to open the wastegate. The pressure at the top bar assists the spring. This a very simplistic explanation but both work together to keep the wastegate closed so the engine gets as much boost as possible. Note, this not a good thing in most situations.

If you put the pressure on the side port you are helping the spring “open”. You can control how much you “help” the spring with a boost controller.

The point of a dual port wastegate is that it allows you to more accurately fine tune the opening of the wastegate using a boost controller because you can control the pressure helping the spring or countering the spring. It’s a balancing act. The video I linked does a good job at explaining this 🙂

#8

User avatar
NCGermerican
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2022 8:49 am
Location: Raleigh, NC
Has thanked: 141 times
Been thanked: 92 times
944m3 wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2024 2:05 pm This might be semantics or I’m missing your point. But I would not think of it as vacuum.

This is how i understand it, please someone correct me if I’m wrong 🙂

If you put the pressure from the intake via the banjo bolt to the top of the Tial wg, you are adding pressure which helps to keep the wastage closed. Notice I say help. If your spring is 1 bar, and you produce 1 bar boost, the heat or gas pressure in the crossover pipe will need to be 2 bar to open the wastegate. The pressure at the top bar assists the spring. This a very simplistic explanation but both work together to keep the wastegate closed so the engine gets as much boost as possible. Note, this not a good thing in most situations.

If you put the pressure on the side port you are helping the spring “open”. You can control how much you “help” the spring with a boost controller.

The point of a dual port wastegate is that it allows you to more accurately fine tune the opening of the wastegate using a boost controller because you can control the pressure helping the spring or countering the spring. It’s a balancing act. The video I linked does a good job at explaining this 🙂
Applying vacuum to the top port would only be for testing purposes (verify spring pressure) with the wastegate off the car. While on the car, the boost source would attach to the side port and the top port would vent to atmosphere.

My goal is to have the accelerator and the spring be the boost controller since the manual boost controller isn’t very reliable and only accessible in the engine bay.

This gets confusing which is why I posted up for some advice. :)
1987 951 - Nautic Blue over Linen
2015 Audi RS5 Sepang Blue (Daily)
2023 Durango R/T AWD - Destroyer Grey (Wife's Daily)
2013 Audi A5 Quattro - Brilliant Black (Son's daily)
1987 944 S - Nautic Blue over Linen - sold August 2024

#9

User avatar
Tom
Site Admin
Posts: 8948
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:04 pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Has thanked: 936 times
Been thanked: 4013 times
Contact:
Curious advice from Charlie at Evergreen. Legions of 951 folks have used a cabin-mounted manual boost controller and dual port wastegate over the last 2 or 3 decades, with good reliability and control. Much easier to dial in to your desired boost level too. You might need some trial and error with springs alone to get to an optimal boost level. I'm sure Charlie has his reasons, but sitting here I can't think of an advantage of eliminating the boost controller?

#10

Post Reply